On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:45:31AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c | 7 +++++++
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.h | 1 +
> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> index 9a1648a..2e4a69a 100644
> --- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> +++ b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ GList *gvir_config_domain_os_get_boot_devices(GVirConfigDomainOs *os)
> return devices;
> }
>
> +const char *gvir_config_domain_os_get_arch(GVirConfigDomainOs *os)
> +{
g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_OS(os), NULL);
ACK with this added. Is it fine to return NULL when no arch is specified,
or would it be better to return something else?
Christophe
Attachment:
pgp4DkuB8uby5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list