On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ). I think it would be nicer to be consistent > with that for preallocation and not return an error either in this case. I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. Perhaps sparse allocation, or not, does not make a big difference, but prealloc does. So silently ignoring the request is going to cause more trouble. If it's specified, I think it should be respected. -- Marc-André Lureau -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list