Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: create functions to search usb device accurately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/03/2012 01:17 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年05月01日 16:16, Guannan Ren wrote:
usbFindDevice():get usb device according to
                 idVendor, idProduct, bus, device
                 it is the most strict search

usbFindDevByBus():get usb device according to bus, device

Should we name it as usbFindDevByAddress? Given that both 'bus'
and 'device' are used to find the device actually.


    the term 'address' for usb device is used by kernel
    maybe not a good name.

    The codes has been changed according to the following comments



  {
      DIR *dir = NULL;
-    int ret = -1, found = 0;
+    int found = 0;
      char *ignore = NULL;
      struct dirent *de;
+    usbDeviceList *list = NULL, *ret = NULL;
+    usbDevice *usb;
+
+    if (!(list = usbDeviceListNew()))

virReportOOMError();


         usbDeviceListNew has raised OOM Error in that case.

         Guannan Ren

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]