On 04/30/2012 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:28:26PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Addressing the following reports:
None of those reports mention daemon/libvirtd.c and yet
These must have gotten lost:
Error: RESOURCE_LEAK:
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:147:
open_fn: Calling opening function "open".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:147:
var_assign: Assigning: "stdinfd" = handle returned from "open("/dev/null", 0)".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:151:
noescape: Variable "stdinfd" is not closed or saved in function "dup2".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:168:
leaked_handle: Handle variable "stdinfd" going out of scope leaks the handle.
Error: RESOURCE_LEAK:
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:149:
open_fn: Calling opening function "open".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:149:
var_assign: Assigning: "stdoutfd" = handle returned from "open("/dev/null", 1)".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:153:
noescape: Variable "stdoutfd" is not closed or saved in function "dup2".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:155:
noescape: Variable "stdoutfd" is not closed or saved in function "dup2".
/libvirt/daemon/libvirtd.c:168:
leaked_handle: Handle variable "stdoutfd" going out of scope leaks the handle.
daemon/libvirtd.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
@@ -172,6 +173,19 @@ static int daemonForkIntoBackground(cons
_exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
+
+ cleanup_close_stderr_fileno:
+ tmpfd = STDERR_FILENO;
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(tmpfd);
+
+ cleanup_close_stdout_fileno:
+ tmpfd = STDOUT_FILENO;
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(tmpfd);
+
+ cleanup_close_stdin_fileno:
+ tmpfd = STDIN_FILENO;
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(tmpfd);
+
cleanup:
VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(stdoutfd);
VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(stdinfd);
This really seems like overkill& ugly. There is no real world leak
here since this process will immediately exit.
Right, though this should make coverity quiet...
Stefan
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list