> Okay, I screwed up the tarball for the first stable release, due to not > building it from a fresh checkout :/ No changes for this one except a > version > bump and dist rebuild. > > This release can be downloaded at: > > http://libvirt.org/sources/libvirt-0.9.11.2.tar.gz > > Thanks, > Cole > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > > Is there any particular reason that the project is using the same naming convention for stable releases? It appears to be a minor revision update from the standard release cycle. From an outsiders prospective, I don't know how anyone would think that 0.9.11.2 is not a standard update from 0.9.11, as there is no distinction in either the name from the distributed file, or documentation (unless I missed it denoted specifically on libvirt.org). Would there be any objection to using a distribution file name libvirt-stable-0.9.11.2.tar.gz ? To me, it is confusing, but that is just my opinion. Thanks, Jason -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list