On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote: > It doesn't break out the "for" loop even if duplicate pool is > found, and thus the "matchpool" could be overriden as NULL again > if there is different pool afterwards. > > To address the problem in libvirt-user list: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html > --- > src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > ACK Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list