On 04/27/2012 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:59:45PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Since for stable releases, some test files were over the 99 char >> limit for traditional tar filenames. >> >> Suggested by Osier here: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-April/msg01435.html >> >> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> configure.ac | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index 89fe818..a819898 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux]) >> AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) >> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) >> dnl Make automake keep quiet about wildcards & other GNUmake-isms >> -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wno-portability]) >> +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wno-portability tar-ustar]) >> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable]) >> >> # Maintainer note - comment this line out if you plan to rerun > > IIRC we have discussed this before and one of the issues was that the > format is not nearly as portable. On the other hand, any system new > enough to have virtualization support ought to be new enough to be > able to have support for it. I concur - no one is complaining about building libvirt on a machine that lacks a reasonable tar (and if they DO complain, then we can worry about what to do at that point). ACK. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list