On 04/26/2012 02:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out >> that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a >> misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the >> operation, even when qemu was specifically updated to support it. >> The real problem is that we have several capabilities that are >> only determined when starting a domain, and therefore are still >> clear when first working with an inactive domain (namely, any >> capability set by qemuMonitorJSONCheckCommands). >> @@ -12637,6 +12643,12 @@ qemuDomainPMSuspendForDuration(virDomainPtr dom, >> >> priv = vm->privateData; >> >> + if (!virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) { >> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID, >> + "%s", _("domain is not running")); >> + goto endjob; >> + } >> + > Nit, you could move this above the priv =. Neither endjob nor cleanup > need this priv. > But 'goto endjob' is wrong (replace with 'goto cleanup'), D'oh - too much copy-and-paste! You're obviously right (and this is why we do code review). -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list