On 04/26/2012 03:14 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/26/2012 01:09 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> Some of the error messages in this function should have been >> virReportSystemError (since they have an errno they want to log), but >> were mistakenly written as netlinkError, which expects a libvirt error >> code instead. The result was that when one of the errors was >> encountered, "No error message provided" would be printed instead of >> something meaningful (see >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816465 for an example). >> --- >> src/util/virnetlink.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > ACK. > Pushed, Thanks! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list