Am 23. April 2012 18:48 schrieb Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 04/23/2012 02:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Rouault wrote:
>> On Sunday 22 April 2012 10:35:59 Matthias Bolte wrote:
>>> vboxArray is not castable to a COM item type. vboxArray is a
>>> wrapper around the XPCOM and MSCOM specific array handling.
>>>
>>> In this case we can avoid passing NULL as an empty array to
>>> IMachine::Delete by passing a dummy IMedium* array with a single
>>> NULL item.
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste, I can not reproduce the assertion you mentioned, or
>>> I don't know where to look for it. So could you verify that is patch
>>> avoids this assertion?
>>>
>
>>> + /* XPCOM doesn't like NULL as an array, even when the array size
>>> is 0. + * Instead pass it a dummy array to avoid passing NULL. */
>>> + IMedium *array[] = { NULL };
>>> + machine->vtbl->Delete(machine, 0, array, &progress);
>>> # endif
>>> if (progress != NULL) {
>>> progress->vtbl->WaitForCompletion(progress, -1);
>>
>> The patch is good, I don't get the assertion anymore.
>
> Coupled with that functional test, I give my ACK to the code, as a much
> nicer solution than my temporary build-breaker "fix" via a union hack.
Thanks, pushed.
--
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list