Il 18/04/2012 16:18, Jiri Denemark ha scritto: > However, the question is whether we feel comfortable enough with pushing this > with the risk that qemu implementation is not upstream yet. I think the API is > sane but the history of pushing something that qemu ended up implementing in a > different way worries me a bit. FWIW, the worries on the QEMU side aren't really with the API but with the implementation. We are not sure of the drive-reopen API, but the mirroring abstractions (apart from transactions, i.e. patches 19-23) should be fine. Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list