On 2012年04月17日 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年04月17日 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
The new copyright statements is:
<copyright>
Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranties of
TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
</copyright>
I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere in libvirt
code uses
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
update the address in libvirt codes too?
Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's better
, per they moves from time to time, ;-)
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list