Re: [libvirt-glib] libvirt-gconfig: Move symbols introduced post 0.0.4 to the correct versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:41:38PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > > Triggered by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and
> > > > > libvirt-gobject too.
> > > > 
> > > > Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols
> > > > are added in the right place
> > > 
> > > I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be
> > > raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been
> > > any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a
> > > while :-/
> > 
> > So what about the attached patch. 0.0.8 didn't introduce new symbols yet
> > so I went for 0.0.7.
> 
> I'd go for 0.0.8 since I hope to get my usb redir patch series which adds
> new libvirt-gconfig symbols, and this way we won't forget to raise this
> number ;) Or I can add a patch going from 0.0.7 to 0.0.8 in the series.

I think that would be best since we'd start tracking ABI changes this
way.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]