On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > Triggered by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683 > > > --- > > > If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and > > > libvirt-gobject too. > > > > Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols > > are added in the right place > > I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be > raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been > any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a > while :-/ Oh wait yes. I was getting mixed up with libosinfo, which we decided was ABI stable. We can still update libvirt-glib Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list