On 04/07/2012 03:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However the above commit is later amended by this commit: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > commit eaddec976ef06457fee4a4ce86b8c7ee906183b7 > Author: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Aug 24 16:16:45 2011 +0200 > > daemon: Move TLS initialization to virInitialize > > My previous patch 74c75671331d284e1f777f9692b72e9737520bf0 > introduced a regression by removing TLS initialization from client. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > which removes virNetTLSDeinit. This appears to be a mistake, or at > least I can't see the logical reason for it, and according to the > gnutls docs, it would introduce a memory leak looking exactly like the > one I am chasing down. I remember asking at the time, and seem to remember this answer: gnutls_global_init is not thread-safe, and therefore must not be called in the context of a library that might be in use by a multi-threaded parent application. Same goes for gnutls_global_deinit. We'd rather leak the memory (which isn't really a leak unless you dynamically load and unload libvirt multiple times in your app) than risk thread unsafety, all while waiting for gnutls to fix their thread-safety issue. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list