On 03/28/2012 12:57 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > Is this patch too much "new code" to push now? > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-March/msg01228.html > > The reasons I ask are two-fold - > > 1) it sat for a long time before anybody reviewed it. > > 2) I just noticed that there is a bug in the existing code that fails to > flag a change in bridge name as an error (although it does nothing with > it), and this patch would remedy that, so in one way it could be > considered a bugfix. I'm okay calling it a bugfix and pushing it now; the code has been available pre-freeze, and appears to be relatively isolated in what it touches. -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list