On 03/22/2012 02:51 PM, Guannan Ren wrote:
On 03/22/2012 08:54 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
With this patch, the newStream() method of the ConnectAPI class returns
an already encapsulated StreamAPI object .
*lib/connectAPI.py: - modify newStream method to return StreamAPI
object
*lib/streamAPI.py: - modify constructor to take virStream objects
---
lib/connectAPI.py | 4 +++-
lib/streamAPI.py | 9 ++-------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/connectAPI.py b/lib/connectAPI.py
index f52467f..2723fc8 100644
--- a/lib/connectAPI.py
+++ b/lib/connectAPI.py
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import os
import re
import libvirt
+from lib import streamAPI
The initial idea is to have a separate file for each of classes(domain,
storage, etc)
in libvirt.py at least in the form of files. The direction you are
heading here is to
combine them together again.
Testcase is the right place where these objects of encapsulated class
should meet
each other.
I prefer the way of what you did in openConsole API. We just pass the
instance of
ConnectAPI to initiate SteamAPI class for getting the object of SteamAPI
for use
we should delete the newStream method in connectAPI.py.
Right now, the virConnect object from libvirt.py is exposed directly in
existing testcases,
that's not good way compared to what you did in openConsole. I will
clean them next.
What do you think?
Ok, I didn't know you want to keep those classes separate. The only
small issue with this is, that ConnectAPI.newStream() produces
unencapsulated virStream object, but you can get that anyways using the
StreamAPI.getStream() method.
I'll post a v2 of the next patch that adds flags to add them to the
correct file.
Peter
Guannan Ren
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list