Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM wrote on 03/22/2012 05:00:45 PM:
> Maybe we should go with the previous code from a while ago which was
> setting a flag for the thread to die. It caused other work-arounds
> to become necessary but at least we don't have to deal with possibly
> async. deaths of threads holding locks.
Yes, I have in mind a way to do this now that should keep the
simplicity and still not use signals. I'll try this out and
repost.
+-DLS
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list