On 03/16/2012 06:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 03/16/2012 05:51 PM, Alex Jia wrote:
* src/libvirt.c (virStorageVolResize): correct comment typo according to
virStorageVolResizeFlags enum define.
s/define/definition/
Oh, yup. Thanks and pushed with this change now.
Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/libvirt.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libvirt.c b/src/libvirt.c
index d0b1b28..7f8d42c 100644
--- a/src/libvirt.c
+++ b/src/libvirt.c
@@ -13324,15 +13324,15 @@ error:
* capacity; this may make the operation take noticeably longer.
*
* Normally, the operation treats @capacity as the new size in bytes;
- * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_DELTA, then @capacity
+ * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_DELTA, then @capacity
* represents the size difference to add to the current size. It is
* up to the storage pool implementation whether unaligned requests
are
* rounded up to the next valid boundary, or rejected.
*
* Normally, this operation should only be used to enlarge capacity;
- * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_SHRINK, it is possible to
+ * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_SHRINK, it is
possible to
* attempt a reduction in capacity even though it might cause data
loss.
- * If VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_DELTA is also present, then @capacity is
+ * If VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_DELTA is also present, then @capacity is
* subtracted from the current size; without it, @capacity represents
* the absolute new size regardless of whether it is larger or smaller
* than the current size.
ACK with commit msg fixed.
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list