On 12.03.2012, at 18:53, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 12.03.2012 18:47, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 12 March 2012 17:41, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Also keep in mind linux-user. There's no concept of a machine there, but >>> there's a cpu_copy() function used for forking that tries to re-create >>> the CPU based on its model. >> >> Incidentally, do you know why the linux-user code calls cpu_reset on >> the newly copied CPU state but only for TARGET_I386/SPARC/PPC ? That >> looks very odd to me... > > Incidentally for i386 I do: cpu_reset() is intentionally not part of > cpu_init() there because afterwards the machine or something sets > whether this CPU is a "bsp" (Board Support Package? ;)) and only then > resets it. > > For ppc and sparc I don't know but I'd be surprised if it's necessary > for ppc... Alex? Phew - no idea. Does git blame know more there? :) Alex -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list