On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:25:02PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.h | 4 ++
>> libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym | 4 ++
>> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.c b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.c
>> index 85cc194..61d35bd 100644
>> --- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.c
>> +++ b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-interface.c
>> @@ -96,6 +96,41 @@ void gvir_config_domain_interface_set_model(GVirConfigDomainInterface *interface
>> "model", "type", model);
>> }
>>
>> +const char *gvir_config_domain_interface_get_ifname(GVirConfigDomainInterface *interface)
>
> Unless I'm missing something, this should not be const (caller needs to
> free the returned string).
>
>> +{
>> + g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_INTERFACE(interface), NULL);
>> +
>> + return gvir_config_object_get_attribute(GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(interface),
>> + "target", "device");
>
> This is "dev", not "device"
Turns out that i copy&pasted the "device" from the corresponding
setter. Wonder if this explains why I see a flat network graph in
boxes for every domain..
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list