On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
Since I found a couple other problems, but have made you suffer
through
enough back and forth already, I've made some final suggested changes
myself, and am sending a diff patch as a response to this message
(differences from your latest version to mine), as well as doing a
repost of the original two patches with your latest changes and mine
squashed in.
Please 1) take a look at the changes in my diff patches , then 2) test
the updated versions of the full patches (I'm unable to test beyond
compiling), and send your ACK if they're okay. Once I have your ACK
back, I'll push (I promise, I won't find any new issues *this*
time :-)
ACK.
The code tests out fine. One nit I found in the logs was that the
removal
was indicated by the wrong method:
diff --git a/src/util/virnetlink.c b/src/util/virnetlink.c
index fd6f751..614f8da 100644
--- a/src/util/virnetlink.c
+++ b/src/util/virnetlink.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ virNetlinkEventRemoveClient(int watch, const
unsigned char *
virNetlinkEventRemoveClientPrimitive(i);
VIR_DEBUG("removed client: %d by %s.", srv-
>handles[i].watch,
- srv->handles[i].watch ? "index" : "mac");
+ srv->handles[i].watch ? "mac" : "index");
ret = 0;
goto cleanup;
}
--
Thanks for the effort !
Dirk H
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list