On 02/20/2012 01:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/20/2012 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > >> + >> +/* Flags for the 'type' field in next struct */ > Should we specifically call out virDomainDeviceDef, rather than the > vague "next struct"? But this is faithful code motion, for now. Even though this patch was (mostly - see my addition of DEVICE_TYPE_NONE) code change, and I hadn't noticed that comment's exact text before, I agree with you, so I'm changing it to specifically say virDomainDeviceDef instead of "next struct". -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list