On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:07:45PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > On 02/17/2012 02:51 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:laine@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > On 02/16/2012 06:49 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote: > > > Currently libvirt sets the attached-mac to altered MAC address > > that has > > > first byte set to FE. This patch will change that behavior by > > using the > > > original (unaltered) MAC address from the domain XML > > configuration file. > > > > Maybe I didn't read thoroughly enough, but I don't see where it > > changes > > the behavior - in the cases where previously the first byte was set to > > 0xFE, now you send discourage=true, and in the cases where it didn't, > > now you send discourage=false. > > > > "discourage" means whether bridge should be discouraged to use the > > newly added > > TAP device's MAC address. Libvirt does that by setting the first MAC > > address byte > > high enough. > > > > And here is how this patch works: > > > > 1. Now in virNetDevTapCreateInBridgePort() function we always pass > > exactly the same MAC address that was defined in XML. > > 2. If "discourage" flag was set to true, then we create a copy of MAC > > address and set its first byte to 0xFE > > 3. virNetDevSetMAC() function would use the MAC address that was > > product of #2 > > 4. while virNetDevOpenvswitchAddPort() function would use the > > original MAC address that was passed in #1 (this code did not need > > to be changed so most likely that was the reason why you did not > > notice behavior changes) > > > > > Right. That's what I missed - all I saw was every occurrence of creating > a temporary mac address with 0xFE in the first byte replaced with adding > "discourage=true" to the args. I didn't notice that > virNetDevOpenvswitchAddPort() takes the macaddr (while > virNetDevBridgeAddPort() doesn't). > > But that means that the tap device has been created with an > 0xFE-initiated MAC address, and then you attach to the bridge using the > unmodified address. Is the issue that the mac address used during the > attach needs to match the MAC address that will be in the traffic? Do > connections to an openvswitch bridge have an implied MAC filter on them, > such that only that MAC address gets through? > > (Also, the only time discourage is false is for libvirt's virtual > network bridges. I'm wondering if they could also use the modified MAC > address for the tap devices - if that was the case we could just always > create the temporary MAC address in virNetDevTapCreateInBridgePort() > (and always set the tap device's mac to that).) > > Let's let this sit over the weekend and see if anyone else has a > brilliant idea/insight. The reason for setting the top byte to 0xFE, was that the bridge device will initialize its own MAC address, to the numerically lowest MAC address of all interfaces that are attached. Every time the bridge MAC address changes, we got a network blackout of something like 30-60 seconds IIRC. Setting the guest MAC address to 0xFE ensured that the bridge acquired the MAC address of a physical NIC, and ignored the guest NICs. So before we can go with this patch we need to determine what the OpenVSwitch behaviour is wrt bridge MAC addresses, otherwise this patch could be just reintroducing the problem we solved with this 0xFE byte setting. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list