On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> (We already discussed at length why this >> is needed and we are already doing it for other boolean getters so >> lets not have the discussion about this need, again). > > Actually this was discussed for libosinfo, not libvirt-glib, here is the > relevant email for those who were wondering about this discussion: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2011-November/msg00090.html Ah ok but both libraries are meant to be first-class g* citizens and hence the same need to follow the usual conventions unless there is a compelling reason not to. Also what I said about us already following this convention is not incorrect either, e.g gvir_domain_get_persistent() declared/defined just above this new function. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list