Re: g_error considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:22:54PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In general I agree with the patch series dropping g_error() in favour
> of normal GError reporting, so programs can cope with errors.
> 
> However, it removes the forced logging and it's too easy for the
> caller to ignore them, making it hard to track down when something
> goes wrong.

I added a patch to the series to add a g_warn_if_reached when this is
triggered

> 
> I think this is even more relevant, because libvirt-glib is logging
> *tons* of normal/useless runtime messages

To be honest I didn't really notice that... What kind of useless messages
are you getting ?

Christophe

Attachment: pgpPb0CAyxUrN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]