On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 02:49:46AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 01/26/2012 10:29 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > > >> +/** > >> + * virStorageVolResize: > >> + * @vol: pointer to storage volume > >> + * @capacity: new capacity > > > > In what units? virDomainBlockResize used kbytes as the unit, > > Shouldn't that be implicit unless specified otherwise in the docs? I > am fine with or without explicit docs. Given that virStorageVolInfo works in bytes, then I'd say we should use bytes here too. It is a shame we used kbytes for virDomainBlockResize. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list