|
Hello Eric, On Thursday 19 January 2012 21:38:22 Eric Blake wrote: > That's an unusual mix, where the syscall exists (since 2.6.27) but libc > is too old to use the syscall. The original kernel was 2.6.26, but which later was updated to 2.6.32 for better support of newer hardware. > Then how about this patch: > > From 330f666036943a0fc423a4b5db2ca294fb2a4298 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:35:39 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] build: skip lxc with too-old glibc ... Looks good: Now the missing support is detected and LXC is automatically disabled or refuses to compile. I did NOT test if it still compiles on newer systems. > Reported by Philipp Hahn. You may add a "Testes-by: me" if needed. Thank you for your work and the patch. BYtE Philipp -- Philipp Hahn Open Source Software Engineer hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Univention GmbH Linux for Your Business fon: +49 421 22 232- 0 Mary-Somerville-Str.1 D-28359 Bremen fax: +49 421 22 232-99 http://www.univention.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list