On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:27:30AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:21:33AM -0500, Alex Jia wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > Thanks for your comments, as you said, it should be my > > old glib version issue. > > Thanks for reporting this issue btw :) I think we should raise the glib > requirement a bit (maybe 2.18) and then add fallbacks for the functions you > mentioned My only desire is to retain build compat with RHEL-6 at this point, which has glib 2.22. So increasing the dep to 2.18 is fine with me Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list