Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] RFC: grant KVM guests retain arbitrary capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:25:27PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
> Hi Osier-san, Daniel-san, and all,
> 
> This patchset adds an option for KVM guests to retain arbitrary capabilities.
> The previous versions are here:
>   http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00857.html
>   http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00950.html

Can you give me a little more detail on why you need to make KVM
keep certain capabilities.

In your first message you mention that you need to have 'rawio' for
QEMU ?

I am now wondering if we should do this in a different way. ie if
there is some XML configuration parameter for the <disk> that 
indicates the need for rawio, then libvirt could automatically
ensures that we add CAP_SYS_RAWIO when starting QEMU.

Likewise with type=ethernet, we could probably give QEMU the
CAP_SYS_NETADMIN capability.

To me this feels nicer directly exposing capabilities in the
XML, since these are really an internal impl detail, not a
guest configuration thing.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]