On 2012年01月13日 07:00, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/12/2012 03:53 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
Disk "type" and "device" are generally interesting stuffs the
s/stuffs/stuff/
user who wants to known too. To not breaking the scripts which
s/who wants to known too/may want to know, too/
s/breaking the/break any/
parses the output field, new options "--details" is introduced
s/parses/parsed/
s/new options/a new option/
to output the two introduced fields.
---
tools/virsh.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
tools/virsh.pod | 19 ++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+++ b/tools/virsh.pod
@@ -512,15 +512,16 @@ to a unique target name (<target dev='name'/>) or source file (<source
file='name'/>) for one of the disk devices attached to I<domain> (see
also B<domblklist> for listing these names).
-=item B<domblklist> I<domain> [I<--inactive>]
-
-Print a table showing the names of all block devices associated with
-I<domain>, as well as the path to the source of each device. If
-I<--inactive> is specified, query the block devices that will be used
-on the next boot, rather than those currently in use by a running
-domain. Other contexts that require a block device name (such as
-I<domblkinfo> or I<snapshot-create> for disk snapshots) will accept
-either target or unique source names printed by this command.
+=item B<domblklist> I<domain> [I<--inactive>] [I<--details>]
+
+Print a table showing the brief information of all block devices
+associated with I<domain>. If I<--inactive> is specified, query the
+block devices that will be used on the next boot, rather than those
+currently in use by a running domain. If I<--details> is specified,
+disk type and device value will be printed additionally. Other
s/be printed additionally/also be printed/
+contexts that require a block device name (such as I<domblkinfo>
+or I<snapshot-create> for disk snapshots) will accept either target
+or unique source names printed by this command.
ACK with the grammar cleanups. And don't feel bad - English can be a
tough language; you did quite well at getting the point across, even if
I was able to provide some ideas to polish the final wording. :)
Thanks, pushed. This makes me feel better. :)
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list