On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:56:23PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 10:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > @@ -1103,9 +1163,32 @@ static int lxcControllerMain(int serverFd,
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0 ; i < nFds ; i++) {
> > + consoles[i].epollFd = -1;
> > + consoles[i].epollFd = -1;
>
> Why do you have this line twice? Did you mean to initialize epollWatch
> instead?
Yes, it should have been epollWatch.
> > + consoles[i].hostWatch = -1;
> > + consoles[i].contWatch = -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0 ; i < nFds ; i++) {
> > consoles[i].hostFd = hostFds[i];
> > consoles[i].contFd = contFds[i];
> >
> > + if ((consoles[i].epollFd = epoll_create(2)) < 0) {
>
> Should we be using epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC)?
We don't fork anything more, but I'll change it anyway just in case.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list