Re: RFC: Compiling out SSL support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Attached is the RFC version of patch (against old version of
> libvirt) which compiles out support for SSL encryption on libvirt
> connections.
> 
> It is meant only to provoke a discussion whether such option is
> deemed acceptable to libvirt, or it would be a complete waste of
> time to rebase this patch to current git and improve it by disabling
> other SSL-related functionality.
> 
> The motivation behind the change: making possible to configure
> libvirt to rely on absolute minimum of other libraries. Resulting
> configuration ought to connect to local libvirt daemon through Unix
> sockets.

This is desirable, but I never bothered to do it on the old
libvirt RPC code, because it was such a tangled mess that I
thought the resulting #ifdef conditionals would be quite
unpleasant. Your patch shows that it isn't as bad as I thought
it would be.

With our new RPC code, the TLS stuff is quite well separated
from the rest of the code, so I think I'd be happy to accept
a patch to make TLS optional with latest libvirt GIT trees.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]