Re: [PATCH] seclabel: fix regression in libvirtd restart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05.01.2012 00:01, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit b434329 has a logic bug: seclabel overrides don't set
> def->type, but the default value is 0 (aka static).  Restarting
> libvirtd would thus reject the XML for any domain with an
> override of <seclabel relabel='no'/> (which happens quite
> easily if a disk image lives on NFS), with a message:
> 
> 2012-01-04 22:29:40.949+0000: 6769: error : virSecurityLabelDefParseXMLHelper:2593 : XML error: security label is missing
> 
> Fix the logic to never read from an override's def->type, and
> to allow a missing <label> subelement when relabel is no.  There's
> a lot of stupid double-negatives in the code (!norelabel) because
> of the way that we want the zero-initialized defaults to behave.
> 
> * src/conf/domain_conf.c (virSecurityLabelDefParseXMLHelper): Use
> type field from correct location.
> ---
>  src/conf/domain_conf.c |   16 +++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

ACK.

Although, I'd split the long log line. But that's just cosmetic

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]