On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:08:10PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:38:15PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There are some devices which we are not able to parse yet, in these > > > cases a runtime warning is printed to tell what's going on. > > > > Actually I see that most of the device types are not being handled. > > I would suggest we implement all the cases before merging this or > > otherwise we'll easily forget about this. Yes the warning won't let us > > forget but I don't think emitting a warning for each unimplemented > > type (by the library itself) is a good idea since these warnings are > > visible to users/app developers and they are useless for them. > > Agreed, the way we deal with the XML docs ensures we preserve > any parts of the DOM we don't know about. IMHO we should only > emit a warning if there is a bit of the DOM we don't expect > and we are loosing that data during the requested manipulation. I'll change these warnings to g_debug then Christophe
Attachment:
pgpCpI6SAiyzO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list