On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:25:49PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/22/2011 03:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> Usage: > >>> <filesystem type='mount' accessmode='passthrough' writeout='immediate'> > >>> <source dir='/export/to/guest'/> > >>> <target dir='mount_tag'/> > >>> </filesystem> > >I still don't like the proposed XML. We need to get consensus on where > >to put it, with my proposal being: > > > ><filesystem type='mount'> > > <driver type='path' write='immediate'/> > > <source dir='/export/to/guest'/> > > <target dir='mount_tag'/> > ></filesystem> > > Right, other types of drivers might include a userspace NFS client, > or some kind of "artificial" filesystem. > > In addition, instead of write='immediate' I suggest > cache='writeback'/cache='writethrough'. Yeah I agree - we should follow the syntax we already use for caching with the <disk> element instead of inventing new syntax Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list