On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Breaks API and ABI on the fundamental level but lets fix this now while > >> we don't guarantee any API/ABI stability. > > > > Forgot to mention that this patch is on top of Christophe's ACK'ed but > > unmerged 'Add GVirConfigDomainSound' tree. > > And seems my patch went over the limit so it got chopped. You can > find the patch here as well: > https://gitorious.org/~zeenix/libvirt/zeenix-libvirt-glib/commit/d5e5c64732baa091d5078c87aab64df4cdb9e08d For what it's worth, I don't think this patch improves the situation much if we can't express nested namespaces (ie put all the GVirConfigDomain* objects to a GVir::Config::Domain or GVirConfig::Domain namespace). Since it's pretty invasive, I'd lean toward not applying it, but I have no strong opinion either way, I'm fine if it goes in too. Let's see what danpb thinks about it :) Christophe
Attachment:
pgpnucWjBDWep.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list