On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > xhu wrote: > > On 12/16/2011 11:33 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've noticed a regression in libvirt 0.9.8 on some of my kvm test machines > >> > >> # virsh start opensuse12 > >> error: Failed to start domain opensuse12 > >> error: Cannot open network interface control socket: Permission denied > > For I can't reproduce it on my machine with 0.9.8, can you provide me > > the detailed steps? > > Nothing special, basic domain config using file-backed disk and > connecting to a bridge. > > > Also your os, libvirt, qemu-kvm and kernel version? > > Yeah, it has something to do with the kernel, glibc, or other such > component. qemu-kvm isn't the problem as the error occurs before it is > invoked. > > kernel 3.1.0, glibc 2.14.1 (openSUSE12.1): > With libvirt 0.9.7, starting the domain works. This version of libvirt > opens control socket with 'socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)'. With > libvirt 0.9.8, the domain does not start. In this version, the control > socket is opened with 'socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)', which fails > with EACCES. > > kernel 3.0.13, glibc 2.11.3 (SLES11 SP2): > Regression between libvirt 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 not observed. > > Initially, I assumed the bug was in glibc. But I can open packet(7) > sockets in a test program running as uid=euid=0, just not within > libvirtd running with same privileges. Interesting, this is very bizarre. I assume that if you patch libvirt 0.9.8 to use AF_INET again, it'll work fine ? Is there any other access control mechanism in force like SELinux or AppArmour ? Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list