On 12/13/2011 06:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 12/06/2011 01:38 AM, Eric Blake Write:
>> * libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
>> on architectures where it isn't available.
>> ---
>> libvirt.spec.in | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> ++# Sanlock is available only on i686 x86_64 for RHEL
>
> According this comment, force sanlock only on i686 x86_64 for RHEL
>
>> +%if 0%{?fedora} >= 16
>> +%define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}}
>> +%endif
>> +%if 0%{?rhel} >= 6
>> +%ifnarch i386 i586 i686 x86_64
>
> But here you force it only not on i686 x86_64 for RHEL.
>
> s/ifnarch/ifarch/ ?
Yes, thanks for spotting that. I've pushed the trivial patch in your name.
--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list