On 13.12.2011 07:45, ajia@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Alex Jia <ajia@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Detected by valgrind. Leak introduced in commit 82ff25e. > > * tests/nodeinfotest.c: avoid memory leak on nodeinfo test case. > > * how to reproduce? > % cd tests && valgrind -v --leak-check=full ./nodeinfotest > > * actual valgrind result: > > ==22147== 65 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14 of 29 > ==22147== at 0x4A0610F: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525) > ==22147== by 0x330D6FED94: __vasprintf_chk (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so) > ==22147== by 0x426697: virVasprintf (stdio2.h:199) > ==22147== by 0x426757: virAsprintf (util.c:1695) > ==22147== by 0x41585F: linuxTestNodeInfo (nodeinfotest.c:108) > ==22147== by 0x416B21: virtTestRun (testutils.c:141) > ==22147== by 0x4157EA: mymain (nodeinfotest.c:140) > ==22147== by 0x416217: virtTestMain (testutils.c:696) > ==22147== by 0x330D61ECDC: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so) > ==22147== > ==22147== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==22147== definitely lost: 65 bytes in 1 blocks > ==22147== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==22147== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==22147== still reachable: 126,126 bytes in 1,341 blocks > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/nodeinfotest.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > Although this is not a dramatic leak, for completeness sake: ACK & pushed Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list