On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:04 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/09/2011 11:58 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > > On 12/09/2011 06:35 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > > > I would say something like: > > > > On PowerPC pseries guests, devices can be assigned to the SPAPR VIO bus. > > It has a flat 64-bit address space, by convention devices are generally > > located at a multiple of 0x1000, but other addresses are legal and > > accepted by libvirt. A device can be given an address by specifying the > > <code>reg</code> attribute, this gives the 64-bit address of the device. > > If no <code>reg</code> value is specified libvirt will attempt to assign > > a value for you. > > I think it's a bit redundant to mention that libvirt will assign values > for you, since I already mentioned that prior to the <dl> list: Yeah agreed, I missed that bit. > Given your two reviews, here's what I squashed before pushing. Looks good to me. cheers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list