Re: Horrible performance of virDomainGetInfo()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:45:10PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 14:30:10 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > While investigating the RPC problems I've noticed that we have had a
> > huge performance regression for virDomainGetInfo() due to the change
> > which makes virDomainEndJob() save the XML status file every time it
> > is called.
> > 
> > Previous to this change, 2000 calls to virDomainGetInfo() took ~2.5 seconds
> > 
> > After this change, 2000 calls to virDomainGetInfo() take 2 *minutes* 45 secs
> > 
> > I don't have an answer right now and it shouldnt block the release, but we
> > have todo something to avoid this overhead.
> 
> I think we could change job APIs to only save XML status if async job is
> active since we are currently not really interested in other jobs anyway.

Ok, that sounds like a reasonable idea. Could you cook up a patch for
that.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]