On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:16 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 10:03 AM, Prerna Saxena wrote:
> > @@ -3048,6 +3087,7 @@ virDomainControllerDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
> > }
> >
> > if (def->info.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE &&
> > + def->info.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_SPAPRVIO &&
> > def->info.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI) {
> > virDomainReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> > _("Controllers must use the 'pci' address type"));
> Is this still the proper error message for this type of bus? You may
> want to look at def->os.arch / def->os.machine to see what is expected
> here in terms of bus and then have a more specific error message.
No it's not the right message, which is why we're adding that check to
skip the message if the controller has an spapr-vio address. So I don't
think we need to anything else with arch/machine.
cheers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list