Re: Upgrade-problems from qemu-0.14.1 + libvirt-0.8.4 to qemu-0.15.1 + libvirt-0.9.6: Why I think multifunction=on is a bad idea...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thursday 17 November 2011 18:39:15 Eric Blake wrote:
> Is any of this worth keeping on the public libvir-list?

Not much but to be careful when you upgrade any part of libvirt, qemu(-kvm) or 
it's (external*) dependencies like etherboot/iPXE, vgabios and seabios, 
because it can invalidate your snapshots and saved state.

(*): As Debian does for DFSG-compliance, since it replaces the seabios / 
vgabios / pxe-bios as shipped with qemu by a version compiled from 
(different) sources.

Sincerely
Philipp
-- 
Philipp Hahn           Open Source Software Engineer      hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Univention GmbH        Linux for Your Business        fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
Mary-Somerville-Str.1  D-28359 Bremen                 fax: +49 421 22 232-99
                                                   http://www.univention.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]