On 10/28/2011 10:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/27/2011 02:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:01:24AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
From: Sage Weil<sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add a new secret type to store a Ceph authentication key. The name
is simply an identifier for easy human reference.
The xml looks like this:
<secret ephemeral='no' private='no'>
<uuid>0a81f5b2-8403-7b23-c8d6-21ccc2f80d6f</uuid>
<usage type='ceph'>
<name>mycluster_admin</name>
</usage>
</secret>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil<sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin<josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
docs/schemas/secret.rng | 10 ++++++++++
include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 3 +++
src/conf/secret_conf.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
src/conf/secret_conf.h | 1 +
src/secret/secret_driver.c | 8 ++++++++
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
ACK
I can't find the mail you are replying to, in order to apply it to the
libvirt tree; was it accidentally sent off-list? Can anyone point me to
a git tree with this patch series ready to be merged, or else resend it?
OK, I see an archive of it here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/4129/focus=4133
but mail archives tend to corrupt any text with @, so I hope I'm porting
it correctly. I'm not sure why the mail showed up on ceph-devel but not
libvir-list.
--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list