On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 19:26:24 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > It still needs to be enhanced to be fully portable and working even if > fsync() implementation is insane (e.g., on OSX). > --- > Notes: > Although ideally gnulib would provide us with a sane fsync() and > fdatasync() replacements (it already does so for fsync on Win32) > so this could probably be dropped in favor of a possible future > extension of gnulib (we do not provide any better solution anyway). I will just drop this patch. Gnulib now provides fdatasync replacement and as it turned out fsync on OSX is not as bad as we thought so we don't need a replacement there. virFileSync doesn't give us anything beyond that. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list