Re: [PATCH] build: use gnulib fdatasync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/2011 04:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-gnulib]
> 
> On 10/25/2011 03:44 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 16:44:49 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Commit 1726a73 hacked around MacOS' lack of fdatasync, since
>>> gnulib did not have it at the time.  But now that we use newer
>>> gnulib, we can avoid the hack.
>>>
>>> * bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Add fdatasync.
>>> * configure.ac (AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE): Drop our own check.
>>> ---
>>>   bootstrap.conf |    1 +
>>>   configure.ac   |    5 +----
>>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> ACK
>>
>> BTW, are there any plans on enhancing gnulib fsync module to provide a
>> replacement for certain versions of OS X? Although they provide fsync, it
>> doesn't really sync anything and one needs to do some ioctl hackery to really
>> achieve what fsync should do.
> 
> Any quick pointers to example code using that ioctl?  Then again, I'll probably find them with a quick google search myself.
> 
> Yes, gnulib should be taught to make fsync() more useful on OS X.

Hmm I thought fsync() on both GNU/Linux and OS X were similar.
I.E. flush the OS buffers.
The OS X provided F_FULLFSYNC _in addition_ asks the device to
drain its buffers.

cheers,
Pádraig.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]