On 10/18/2011 02:06 AM, Xu He Jie wrote:
From: soulxu<soulxu@soulxu-ThinkPad-T410.(none)>
When I compile libvirt with gcc-4.6.1 in ubuntu 11.10, got error as below:
CCLD libvirtd
/usr/bin/ld: ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_qemu.a(libvirt_driver_qemu_la-qemu_migration.o): undefined reference to symbol 'gnutls_x509_crt_get_dn@@GNUTLS_1_4'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'gnutls_x509_crt_get_dn@@GNUTLS_1_4' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so so try adding it to the linker command line
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libvirtd] Error 1
It can compile with gcc-4.5.2 in ubuntu 11.04, but it can not compile with gcc-4.6.1 in ubuntu 11.10.
I didn't find reason. Does Anyone know the reason or the different between gcc-4.5.2 and gcc-4.6.1?
More likely, the difference is not in gcc, but in ld policy - Ubuntu
recently changed policy to no longer allow implicit link dependencies by
default (that is, if A links against B, and B links against C, older
distros allowed A to use symbols from C without explicitly linking
against C, while newer distros require the explicit link).
I still provide a patch for this. Just make it is working now.
Signed-off-by: soulxu<soulxu@soulxu-ThinkPad-T410.(none)>
---
src/Makefile.am | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
index 87d91ed..104efc6 100644
--- a/src/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/Makefile.am
@@ -776,10 +776,14 @@ noinst_LTLIBRARIES += libvirt_driver_qemu.la
#libvirt_la_BUILT_LIBADD += libvirt_driver_qemu.la
endif
libvirt_driver_qemu_la_CFLAGS = $(NUMACTL_CFLAGS) \
+ $(GNUTLS_CFLAGS) \
+ $(LIBXML_CFLAGS) \
I understand the addition of GNUTLS_CFLAGS, but why LIBXML_CFLAGS? Did
you get a second link error?
-I@top_srcdir@/src/conf $(AM_CFLAGS)
libvirt_driver_qemu_la_LDFLAGS = $(AM_LDFLAGS)
libvirt_driver_qemu_la_LIBADD = $(NUMACTL_LIBS) \
- $(CAPNG_LIBS)
+ $(CAPNG_LIBS) \
+ $(GNUTLS_LIBS) \
+ $(LIBXML_LIBS)
Likewise.
Your approach to a fix is correct, but I need to know whether to use the
patch as-is or whether we just need one library rather than two.
--
Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list