|
> libvirt will be statically linked with SDK library Sorry, I meant dynamically but at compilation stage instead of dlopen() On Friday, September 30, 2011 12:21:05 PM Dmitry Mishin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 06:10:19 PM Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > Any pointers ? All I found was > > > > http://www.parallels.com/ptn/download/sdk/ > > > > > > > > and it's quite silent on code availability and Licence for the > > > > libraries. > > > > > > It has a proprietary license and not open sourced now. Is it a problem? > > > > If the license is not LGPLv2+ compatible, then it can't be used > > by libvirt, regardless of whether it is directly linked, or > > dlopened. In other words using 'dlopen' doesn't magically solve > > the license compatibility problem. > > Will we solve the issue if libvirt will be statically linked with SDK > library (as Daniel requests) and SDK library itself will be distributed in > binary form under BSD license conditions (which is LGPLv2 compatible)? -- Thanks, Dmitry. |
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list