Am 20.09.2011 20:01, schrieb Eric Blake: > On 09/20/2011 11:39 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: >> The commit that prevents disk corruption on domain shutdown >> (96fc4784177ecb70357518fa863442455e45ad0e) causes regression with QEMU >> 0.14.* and 0.15.* because of a regression bug in QEMU that was fixed >> only recently in QEMU git. With affected QEMU binaries, domains cannot >> be shutdown properly and stay in a paused state. This patch tries to >> avoid this by sending SIGKILL to 0.1[45].* QEMU processes. Though we >> wait a bit more between sending SIGTERM and SIGKILL to reduce the >> possibility of virtual disk corruption. I really think libvirt should never SIGKILL qemu unless it's explicitly told so. Management tools should try to ask the user before doing so. Killing qemu with SIGKILL is never safe. >> --- >> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 7 +++++++ >> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 + >> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ >> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > ACK. But it would be nice if upstream qemu could give us a more > reliable indication of whether the qemu SIGTERM bug is fixed, so that we > don't corrupt data on a patched 0.14 or 0.15 qemu. 0.14 shouldn't have this bug, but it looks like 0.15 has it. Justin, can you cherry-pick d9389b96 and 941f511a into stable-0.15 in order to fix -no-shutdown? Kevin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list